PUBLIC SHOOTINGS: ANOTHER TREND THAT COULD SPREAD QUICKLY EQUALLY

JAYLEN FRYBEG: SCHOOL SHOOTER

THE VIEW THIS WEEK: Picking talking points from happenings from last week, we try to emphasize a steadily rising trend, which we might see spread across the globe soon. Terrorism was once a problem for a few countries, now we all can speak differently about it. DURU CHIMEZIE, writes.

Despite how unrelated it may seem, the public shootings witnessed both in Canada and the United States should be a strong indicator to two things: terrorism has well and truly spread more than we all (or most) expected and public shootings are showing signs it could equally do same.

Earlier this year, a United States report indicated that global terrorism rose by a staggering 43%, in 2013 and this was in spite of al-Qaida splintering. Counter-terrorism campaign globally were majorly sprawling, yet almost 3,000 people were kidnapped or taken hostage by terrorists. Rapid deterioration of security in Iraq, the grinding civil war in Syria and persistent insurgency and terrorism in Pakistan and Afghanistan made sure the figures remained high. Iraq, where voting in parliamentary elections took place in April, 6,378 people were killed and another 14,956 wounded in terrorist incidents last year, a sharp rise from 2012’s 2,436 dead and 6,641 wounded. Total attacks in the country rose to 2,495 in 2013 from 1,271 the previous year. In neighboring Syria, where a three-year civil war has left an estimated 150,000 people dead, America's State Department found attacks were up to 212 from 133, although their lethality remained at approximately five people killed per assault.  

A major jihadist group responsible for many of the attacks in both countries, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (now also called ISIS), increased in potency in 2013. It killed 1,725 people last year, above its 892 death toll in 2013, and increased its efficiency to 4.30 deaths per attack from 3.58. These all point to one single thing; the rate of terrorism has soared and has spread so vastly, that it has become a global problem. Date these series of research a collection of years backwards and you will find a minimal activity; which seemed to be concerns of a few countries too if not one.

A similar but unrelated article from CNN in April of 2014 which placed its emphasis on happenings of the previous 18 months, once placed the number of school shootings similar to the just witnessed incidents of Washington state, at fifteen (15). To place this into better perspective, the number of all school shooting incidents (irrespective of whether it matches the case in question or not) that took place within the same bracket, stand at seventy-four (74). Seventy-four school shootings in just a year and half is simply staggering! When you consider that this figure plus a couple more from a little while before, are seen to form more than half of the total figure since 1966, it leaves you in an awful state of mind. Simply put, the rate of senseless public/school mass shootings is becoming gruesomely unbearable.

What should boggle the mind more, is the potential of this 'new' global threat to peace. This is the same path terrorism was known to take. Beginning little within countries until it gathered a certain level of weird appeal leading to sporadic and unpredictable shots of terrorist activities all over the globe. Even when mass shootings have no clear terrorist undertone, they still carry significant threat. The worry must be that when rebellious groups are not seeing it as a means or tool for causing mayhem, 'average' citizens may happily adopt it as a way of expressing their frustration over more personal targets. Thus leaving various security outfit with a big question to answer: how do you stop possible mass shootings from persons who may have never shown any such tendencies before doing so? Of course, that is made even tougher since such a person would obviously not be in their 'watch-list'. This is a question that will always leave secret security operatives mulling.

The first step to putting an end to a possible increase would obviously start with the United States. I agree that the earlier the global community begins to appreciate this as one of their problems, the better. I will be talking a bit more on that later. However, I think the United States must cause it to lose any appeal it may have at this stage. This should go a long way in determining how much interest external potential 'shooters' would give into this latest bizarre trend. This can then be followed by efforts from global leaders, in making sure there is a level of preparation to nip the bud early once there are signs that this may still be finding its way into other quarters of the globe. In this manner, little chance will be given to an ugly inclination which if left unchecked, could do worse than terrorism.





Remember, at 360talkatives you should always leave a comment...
Share on Google Plus

About Unknown

Scroll down to bottom of page to find out more about this author.
    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments :

Post a Comment

The 'Name/Url' option is advisable. You can fill in just 'Name' and ignore the 'url box'.

Promote Our Site On Facebook

What do you think of our site?

NOW THAT YOU'VE READ THE POST CAN YOU CLICK THE POND TO FEED THE FISH?